The 9/11 Culprits behind the anti-Bollyn protests
September 22, 2016
"Our oppression is not up for debate" - This protestor at Bollyn's event in Brooklyn does not seem to grasp what my presentation is all about. Who is oppressing Jews in America? Is pointing out Israeli and Zionist involvement in the dual deception of 9/11 and the War on Terror oppressing her? Is it wise for Jews to stand up against 9/11 truth?
When I spoke at the Brooklyn Commons on September 7 there was a small group of protestors who had been organized by a group called Jews for Racial and Economic Justice (JFREJ). This organization had posted an announcement calling for a protest several days prior to the event.
As this poster shows, the JFREJ sought to portray me as a "right-wing conspiracy theorist" and a "raging anti-Semite" to mobilize its members to protest.
Many of the emails that were sent to harass other venues came from Rafael Shimunov, a Jewish immigrant from the Soviet Union, who used very un-American tactics to threaten sponsors and interfere in contracts in New York, Texas, and Denmark. Shimunov just became a member of the board of directors of JFREJ in September 2016.
Shimunov wrote a posting calling me a hate-monger, entitled "Who is Christopher Bollyn?"
JFREJ'S SPONSORS ARE TIED TO 9/11 CRIMES AND COVER-UP
JFREJ is supported by the UJA Federation, where Larry Silverstein was national chairman and is now an honorary member of the board of directors, the Jewish Women's Foundation of New York, where his wife, Klara, is an honorary member of the board, and the Covenant Foundation, which is headed by Susan Crown, daughter of Lester Crown and member of the Henry Crown family which controls General Dynamics and the Aspen Institute. Lester Crown admitted on video that his father bought an entire military aircraft plant in the United States and smuggled it to Israel in violation of U.S. law in the early 1950s. The plant provided by Henry Crown became Israel Aircraft Industries. Larry Silverstein owned the three towers that were demolished on 9/11 taking some 2,700 lives with them. The Crown family is connected to both the JFK murder and 9/11 cover-ups. Susan Crown's maternal grandfather owned the Ambassador Hotel when Bobbie Kennedy was killed there.
Israeli Politician Explains How Criticism of Israel is Stifled in USA and Europe
September 22, 2016
In an interview with American journalist Amy Goodman (2002), the Israeli politician Shulamit Aloni explained how the charge of anti-Semitism is "a trick we use" to suppress criticism of Israel coming from within the United States, and that for criticism coming from Europe "we bring up the Holocaust."
Amy Goodman: Yours is a voice of criticism we don’t often hear in the United States. Often when there is dissent expressed in the United States against policies of the Israeli government, people here are called anti-semitic. What is your response to that as an Israeli Jew?
Shulamit Aloni: Well, it’s a trick, we always use it. When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel, then we bring up the Holocaust. When in this country people are criticizing Israel, then they are anti-Semitic. And the organization is strong, and has a lot of money, and the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong and they are strong in this country, as you know. And they have power, which is OK. They are talented people and they have power and money, and the media and other things, and their attitude is “Israel, my country right or wrong”, identification. And they are not ready to hear criticism. And it’s very easy to blame people who criticize certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic, and to bring up the Holocaust, and the suffering of the Jewish people, and that is justify everything we do to the Palestinians.
Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States
This article, which I wrote in December 2007, is now being added to Bollyn.com.
Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States
For all practical purposes, the United States and Britain are Zionist-occupied nations. Because the American and British people are generally ignorant of what Zionism is, the meaning of this statement is not widely understood or appreciated.
The lack of understanding by the public, however, doesn't change the fact that these once great nations have become Zionist-controlled states. The evidence is clearly seen in the self-destructive foreign policies these nations have pursued for the past 40 years or so.
The Anglo-American "leadership" positions in the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq and their support of the costly Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" is further proof that Zionists control these nations – as if any were needed.
How did these powerful and independent nations become Zionist controlled? Unlike Palestine, where Eastern European Zionist immigrants used brutal terrorism to ethnically "cleanse" and conquer the land, in Britain and the United States the Zionists gained power gradually through "dumbing down" and effectively disenfranchising the native populations.
In Britain and the United States, the Zionists saved the use of terrorism for later, after they already controlled the media and the levers of power and government.
Americans today still believe they are free because the media tells them so and because they don't see the restraints and are able to move around and buy things. Americans are, indeed, free to work and shop, but they have virtually no real political power whatsoever. A good example is that while an overwhelming majority of the U.S. population is against the war in Iraq, the war and the huge spending bills to support it go on unchallenged by their representatives in Congress. Why don't the Congressmen vote to stop the disastrous war that has consumed hundreds of billions of dollars and taken more than 3,000 American lives?
Most Americans in the "land of the free and the home of the brave" are completely unaware that they have lost the most cherished democratic franchise, i.e. the citizen's fundamental right to vote and count their votes. They think their vote counts and don't have a clue that they lost their democratic franchise years ago. They are unaware of this situation simply because the media has not told them.
"If the media doesn't talk about, it must not be a problem" is the American way of thinking.
For the Zionist-controlled media, the absence of any citizen oversight of the vote-counting process and complete lack of transparency in American elections are simply non-issues, just like many other very important subjects of vital importance to the survival of the republic.
As Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." This aptly describes the difficult condition Americans face at the beginning of the 21st Century.
Zionists, a marginal minority of Polish and Russian Jewish immigrants, were able to gain control of these great English-speaking nations by obtaining control of two fundamental institutions: the media and academia. This is not to say that they don't control other key institutions, but these two are of essential importance because they largely define the intellectual life of a nation.
Having worked in the media and studied Middle East history at an American university, I know what I am talking about here. History of the Middle East and Europe, and virtually every other subject taught at American universities, is viewed only through the Zionist prism.
For example, when I studied the Middle East at the University of California at Santa Cruz, the head of the department was a professor named Edmund Burke who had studied under the famous British Jew, Bernard Lewis, at Princeton. Burke was always recommending the books of Bernard Lewis, which I avoided like the plague.
American historian Joel Beinin called Lewis "perhaps the most articulate and learned Zionist advocate in the North American Middle East academic community."
"Terry" Burke spent 1990 "on sabbatical" with Lewis at Princeton. He returned to Santa Cruz in the late summer, just before the U.S. invasion of Iraq in January 1991. I remember Burke giving a speech in August or September at the federal building in Santa Cruz as the conflict was heating up. The very first words out of his mouth were "Balkanization," something that amazes me to this day. He was unwilling to explain his choice of words when I called him about a year ago.
Edmund "Terry" Burke of U.C. Santa Cruz
Although my main interest was Israel and Palestine, Burke recommended that I read a book about Yugoslavia. Balkanization, the breaking up of nations into ethnic statelets, is the Zionist plan for the entire Middle East, articulated by Oded Yinon of the Israeli foreign ministry in the early 1980s.
During the many lectures and courses I studied on the Middle East, never did I hear a critical word about Zionism or its brutal history in Eastern Europe and Palestine. This is primarily because the professors of Middle Eastern studies and European history are usually Jewish and strongly inclined to support Zionism.
If a professor were to openly criticize Zionism as the racist and violent ideology that it is, he would probably find himself unemployed in very short order.
I understood this and endeavored to present the anti-Zionist perspective at the university. I brought speakers like Ralph Schoenman, the author of The Hidden History of Zionism (1988), to the campus and led a tour of photojournalists to the West Bank and Gaza Strip shortly after the invasion of Iraq. Despite a great deal of effort and years of experience in the region, Burke did not give me "honors" with my degree, most likely because of my anti-Zionist views.
The media in the United States is controlled in the same way as the universities. The editors and journalists are prevented from investigating and discussing the real history of Zionism because the news outlets are usually owned by people who are themselves dedicated Zionists. The takeover of CNN by Gerald M. Levin of AOL Time Warner marked the fall of the last major non-Zionist media network.
Today, all major news outlets in the United States and Britain are strongly Zionist. There were a few good newspapers, such as the Christian Science Monitor, that provided some balance to the pro-Zionist "mainstream" networks, but even they have now fallen.
The result is that the populations of the United States, Britain, and Australia are largely ignorant of Zionism and what it has done in the past in other countries -- and what it is doing now -- in theirs.
Selecting issues and non-issues for coverage is the primary method employed by the Zionist-controlled news networks. Issues get a lot of coverage while non-issues get none.
Here are a few examples of issues and non-issues in the Zionist-controlled media:
• Iran's legal and monitored efforts to develop nuclear energy are an issue; Israel's illegal and secret nuclear arsenal is not.
• Discussion of the alleged role of Muslims in terrorist acts is an issue; solid evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and the London bombings is not.
• The two-year long fake presidential campaign with a host of Zionist-controlled candidates is an issue; how our electronic "votes" are counted by mysterious "private" foreign companies of unknown ownership is not.
I don't know if any other American journalist and 9-11 researcher has been attacked, TASERed, and had their elbow broken by an undercover tactical squad in front of their family in the United States, but I know that when it happened to me in August 2006 it was very much a non-issue with the controlled media.
WHO ARE THESE FOREIGN MINISTERS?
The position of foreign minister, or secretary of state in the United States, is a very important position, second only to the president or prime minister. Since foreign policy is the only policy coming out of Washington or London these days, these positions are of crucial importance and speak volumes about who is really controlling the government.
In the United States and Britain we have very strange people with odd backgrounds in these high-level appointed positions. The current British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs is a 42-year-old politician named David Wright Miliband, the son of the Belgian-born Marxist, Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband.
The U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, a 53-year-old former professor, holds the comparable position in the American government.
What is most peculiar -- and telling -- is that the backgrounds, loyalties, and ideologies of these two high-level appointed officials are never discussed in the Zionist-controlled media; clearly this is a non-issue.
WHO IS DAVID MILIBAND?
It goes without saying that both Miliband and Rice are dedicated Zionists, they are, after all, serving in extremely pro-Zionist governments. But why are their personal and family histories not discussed by the media? Don't the American and British people have a right to know the person who is overseeing the implementation of their national foreign policy?
David Miliband, who only became a Member of Parliament in June 2001, was recently in Basra, Iraq, when the British officially stepped back from their failure and turned over control to Iraqi authorities.
Although Miliband and other British officials have tried to put a good face on the disastrous results of the Anglo-American invasion and occupation, the fact that it has been a complete failure is painfully apparent to all.
As a senior Iraqi military officer told ABC News, "The British legacy in Basra is criminal gangs, a corrupt and infiltrated police force, and borders open to all."
Major-General Jalil Khalaf, the new police commander in Basra, told the Times of London: "They left me militia, they left me gangsters, and they left me all the troubles in the world."
Yousif Nassar, one of Basra’s most famous composers, is also disappointed at what the British did to his city. "The British Forces created chaos and failed to deliver what they promised," he said, as reported by the Times of December 17, 2007.
The Times article was entitled "Crumbling services and violence on the streets, but hope follows British pullout."
"We congratulate all of those who have helped achieve this, most notably British and Coalition military and civilian personnel," Defense Secretary Des Browne and David Miliband said in a joint statement when the pullout was announced. How could these senior British officials congratulate anyone for their achievements in Basra? The Anglo-American occupation of Iraq is nothing but an unmitigated disaster. Perhaps that was the plan all along?
Knowing who David Miliband is and what he represents is key to understanding the real power behind Britain's foreign policy. This is certainly the reason the Zionist-controlled media keeps the British population – and the world – ignorant of the Miliband family's roots – in Brussels.
David Miliband is the son of Ralph Miliband, born Adolphe in Brussels in 1924, and Marion Kozak. Ralph was a well known Marxist political theorist. Ralph, who died in 1994, is buried in Highgate Cemetery close to his idol, Karl Marx.
Miliband and his father, the Marxist Ralph Milliband at his spacious home in a comfortable part of London
David's brother, Edward Samuel Miliband, is also a member of Prime Minister Gordon Brown's cabinet where he has been chairman of the Treasury's Council of Economic Advisers, which directs the UK's long-term economic planning.
Beyond that, the family history gets confusing and misleading, on purpose I'm sure.
The online biography of Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband says he was born in Brussels of Polish-Jewish emigré parents and that both his parents lived in the Jewish quarter of Warsaw, before his father, Samuel "Sam" Miliband, joined the Red Army in the Polish-Soviet or Bolshevik War (February 1919 – March 1921).
Sam Miliband is said to have left Poland after the First World War, which ended in November 1918. He supposedly became a leather worker in Belgium and then returned to Poland to join the Red Army under the command of Leon Trotsky (born Lev Davidovich Bronstein) in 1920.
The commanders who served under Trotsky in the Bolshevik War against Poland were Mikhail Tukhachevsky, Aleksandr Yegorov, Joseph Stalin, and Felix Dzerzhinsky.
Nikolay Bukharin, writing in the Soviet newspaper Pravda, urged the Bolsheviks to carry on beyond Warsaw "right up to London and Paris."
General's Tukhachevsky's order of July 2, 1920 read: "To the West! Over the corpse of White Poland lies the road to world-wide conflagration. March on Vilno, Minsk, Warsaw! Onward to Berlin over the corpse of Poland!"
Why would a poor leather worker in Belgium give up his work and travel all the way to Poland to fight with the Bolshevik Red Army against the Polish Republic and the West? If this is true, Samuel Miliband must have been a very dedicated communist.
This is, however, most certainly not the whole truth. The family tree of the family of David and Edward Miliband clearly indicates that their grandfather Samuel Miliband was also born, like their father Adolphe, in Brussels in 1865. In this case, Brussels-born Sam must have been an extremely dedicated communist. There is another possible explanation. Perhaps Sam was a Zionist emissary on a mission to bring support and funds to the Red Army in their attempt to conquer Poland. If the family tree is correct that Sam Miliband was born in Brussels, there is something more to the Miliband story.
The Miliband family tree provides the names and dates of birth of Samuel's 11 siblings, his parents, and even his grand-parents, data which supports it as a credible source. Why then has the Zionist-controlled media obscured the Miliband family history and pretended that David's father was born in Warsaw, when his family records indicate he was born in Brussels?
This is information about the Miliband family that the Zionist-controlled media had evidently decided that the public does not need to know. It also suggests that the preferential treatment and promotions that the Milibands have received since coming to Britain have more to do with their high-level connections than with their abilities.
Their connections and loyalties are evidently to the highest levels of the Zionist "Communist" International in Brussels, which is the only reason they are in the positions they are in. Their loyalty is clearly not to the British nation or people.
WHO IS JOSEF KORBEL?
The same is true of Condoleezza Rice, who was mentored at the University of Denver by the Czechoslovakian Jewish immigrant, Josef Korbel, the father of the previous secretary of state, Marie Jana Korbelova, a.k.a. Madeleine Albright.
Marie Jana Korbelova with her father, Josef Korbel - 1943
One might think that this amazing coincidence would be newsworthy but it has generally been ignored by the controlled media as well. This is probably because the obvious question, "Who is Josef Korbel?" is a question the Zionist-controlled media does not want to address.
Josef Korbel (1909-77) was a Czechoslovakian diplomat in the London-based "government" in exile of Edvard Benes, which took power in Prague after World War II. Korbel was the father of Bill Clinton's Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, and the mentor of George W. Bush's Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice. What a coincidence – or is it?
Condoleezza Rice and Zippy Livni, the Israeli foreign minister.
Livni is the daughter of the former head of operations of the Irgun, a Zionist terror organization.
Korbel was also a thief. Korbel stole paintings which belonged to German industrialist Karl Nebrich, whose property in Prague was confiscated as part of the post-war Benes decrees. Like the more than three million other ethnic Germans from Bohemia, Moravia, and Slovakia, Nebrich and his family were expelled from the country under the postwar decrees, which oddly remain in force to this day.
Would any European nation that banned Jews and confiscated their property be allowed to be a member of the European Union? Why are such racist laws permitted against Germans?
Korbel's stealing of property and art is just the tip of the iceberg. Korbel was involved in the United Nations partition of India and Pakistan and the illegal arming of the Zionist fighters in Palestine until the end of 1948.
When the communists came to power in 1948, Korbel was charged and sentenced and fled to New York where he lived in the cottage house of a very large mansion in Great Neck, New York. He was eventually given a teaching position at the University of Denver.
The Korbel's move to New York is described in Seasons of Her Life, A Biography of Madeleine Albright:
The Korbels settled into a home just outside New York City. One of Joseph Korbel's colleagues at the United Nations had helped the family rent a small gardener's cottage at 149 Station Road in a woodsy section of Great Neck, a prosperous and developing suburban community on Long Island's North Shore.
Korbel clearly played a key role in the Zionist-Israeli weapons pipeline from Czechoslovakia, which was the main supplier and base for the nascent Israeli Air Force. The Zionist air bridge from Czechoslovakia, known as Operation Balak, was the essential weapons supply line and is regarded as one of the Israeli Air Force's most important achievements. Czechoslovakia provided weapons, ammunition, and the first fighter airplanes to the Zionist forces in Palestine.
The would-be Israelis even operated their own airbase and pilot training school in Czechoslovakia. Yugoslavia played an important role as the main transit point for arms shipments going by sea and a refueling stop for the Israeli and Zionist pilots flying fighter aircraft from Czechoslovakia to Palestine – which became the State of Israel after May 1948.
Korbel, an avowed anti-communist and senior member of the Benes government, became the Czech ambassador to Belgrade at this time, although he hated the socialism of Tito. Korbel was the ambassador in Yugoslavia because he was playing another more important role: the key Zionist point man in the illegal weapons transfers to Jewish forces in Palestine. The people, such as Shimon Peres, who were involved in the illegal weapons smuggling to the Haganah and the Irgun terrorist gangs in Palestine have been at the top of the Zionist hierarchy since 1948.
There is, of course, much more to the sordid Milliband, Korbel, and Rice histories. This material is provided simply to illustrate the high-level Zionist connections of the people who shaped and taught the current foreign ministers of Britain and the United States. Because this information is not provided by the controlled media in these two great nations, I am providing this research to help my fellow Americans and British friends realize who is controlling their foreign policy – which is nothing short of disastrous.
Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to email@example.com
Source: "Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States," Rumor Mill News, Christopher Bollyn, December 20, 2007
The Zionist War on Terror Creates More Terror
December 3, 2015
If there’s one thing the “war on terror” has excelled at, it is creating more war – and if there is a second, it is creating more terror.
- "The entire ‘war on terror’ has been a lie – and these charts prove it"
by Rebecca Sumner, TheCanary.co, November 28, 2015
The "War on Terror" has created more war – and more terror...
(Graphics: R. Sumner)
and in Syria, among other places.
So, in reality, what is the "War on Terror"? Where did it come from?
AN ISRAELI WAR STRATEGY - The "War on Terror" is a massive Zionist/Israeli fraud that has been based on lies and deception since it was first conceived by Benjamin Netanyahu and his 'institute of terrorism' in Israel in the 1970s. The "War on Terror" deception is the subject of my Solving 9-11 books.
NETANYAHU'S MISSION - From 1976 to 1978, Benjamin Netanyahu worked for the Boston Consulting Group, a firm connected to the Rothschild family. In 1979, with his father, Benzion, Netanyahu co-founded an institute on terrorism. They then organized an international conference in Jerusalem that emphasized the need for Western nations to fight terror groups (the groups opposed to Israeli occupation) - and the regimes supporting them. The terrorism data that Netanyahu used to make his case at the conference was exaggerated and fraudulent. George H.W. Bush spoke at the conference.
THE JERUSALEM CONNECTION
from my 2013 article "Obama's Trip to Birthplace of War on Terror"
"In the summer of 1979, a group of powerful and influential people joined to launch an international propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of 'international terrorism'," Philip Paull of San Francisco State University wrote in his 1982 thesis on the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. "The propaganda 'blitz' originated in Jerusalem. The conspiratorial network included present and former members of the Israeli and United States governments...
"This 'anti-terrorist' propaganda campaign was and is being conducted in a style reminiscent of wartime 'psychological warfare' by journalists serving as conduits and spreaders of misinformation originating in Jerusalem," Paull wrote in his thesis...
As Paull demonstrates in his thesis, "the entire notion of 'international terrorism' as promoted by the Jerusalem Conference rests on a faulty, dishonest, and ultimately corrupt information base." This is equally true of the official versions of the terror attacks of 1993 and 2001. They are nothing more than packs of lies designed to place the blame on Arabs and Muslims.
The American people have been the primary target of the vicious 'psychological warfare' waged by the Israeli government. The purpose of the Israeli psychological warfare is to create fear through false-flag terrorism like 9-11 in order to impose the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror". I have done my utmost to provide an antidote to this fear and deception with my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.
"The heightened global media coverage of 'international terrorism'", Paull wrote, "was for the most part a result of a deliberate, well-financed, international propaganda campaign initiated by the Israeli government."
The theme of 'international terrorism' "was used to portray the 'Free World', including Israel, as essentially on the defensive before a virtual epidemic of terrorism which treatened the very fabric of civilization," Paull wrote. "But in order to transfigure 'international terrorism' into a political bubonic plague, it was necessary to produce false and misleading 'information', or misinformation." Paull's thesis explains how the Netanyahu institute and the Israeli government used misinformation to "deliberately exploit the emotions of fear and anxiety."
MEET THE MILEIKOWSKY'S - Benjamin Netanyahu and his father, Benzion Mileikowsky from Warsaw, Poland. Benzion was the executive secretary for Vladimir Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism, which calls for the military conquest of all of Palestine and expulsion of the non-Jewish population. His son, Bibi, has furthered these goals. 9-11 was an essential part of the Zionist deception, a terror spectacle designed to change U.S. public opinion and drag the United States military into the Middle East - to fight Israel's enemies.
NETANYAHU THE ARCHITECT OF TERROR - Netanyahu's first book, International Terrorism: Challenge and Response, is based on the speeches given at the Jerusalem conference in 1979. Netanyahu has made a career of pushing the Israeli war strategy known as the "War on Terror". It is a strategy of conquest in which the United States and its allies fight wars in the Middle East on behalf of the Zionist state and its war agenda. Creating a greater state of Israel, a goal of the terrorist groups that created the Likud party in the 1970s, is part of the plan.
This is why Ehud Barak, Netanyahu's former commander in the Sayeret Matkal covert commando force, was ready in the BBC World television studio in London on 9-11 - ready to prompt the world to begin "an operational, concrete, war against terror" before either of the Twin Towers had even collapsed. Co-incidence? Not a chance.
This is why "Solving 9-11 Ends the War" is the theme of my presentations. This is because when enough people understand that the "War on Terror" is a massive Zionist/Israeli deception that is actually designed to create more war and terrorism, we can put an end to the whole evil madness. But, we can't end it as long as so many people are deceived and do not understand the real source of the problem.
Photo: Mike Chickey
If you appreciate my articles,
please support my research and writing.
Click here to donate
or donate via PayPal to: firstname.lastname@example.org
"Despite 14 Years of the US War on Terror, Terror Attacks Have Skyrocketed Since 9/11" by Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News, September 11, 2015
Mike Chickey, photographs of Bollyn at The Oscars 2015, February 22, 2015
"Obama's Trip to Birthplace of War on Terror" by Christopher Bollyn, March 19, 2013
"The entire ‘war on terror’ has been a lie – and these charts prove it" by Rebecca Sumner, The Canary, November 28, 2015
The Paris Attacks - À quoi bon?
November 17, 2015
HOLLANDE AND THE ROTHSCHILD BANKSTERS - François Hollande, seen here with David de Rothschild, appointed a Rothschild banker to manage the French ministry of economy in 2014. What does that say about Hollande's loyalty?
"An act of war was committed by a terrorist army, DAESH [ISIS], a jihadist army, against France… An act of war prepared, planned, from outside, with outside complicity which an investigation will establish."
- French President François Hollande, November 14, 2015
"We need to work to find a political solution. Bashar al-Assad is not the solution, he is the problem."
- French President François Hollande, October 23, 2015
“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”
- Franklin D. Roosevelt
The Friday the 13th terror attacks in Paris seem to have accomplished exactly what they were meant to. They have seemingly given the French and the U.S. the right to attack “without mercy” ISIS forces in Syria. While the strikes are supposedly aimed at ISIS, the country taking the pounding is Syria.
There are basically two ways to view the terror attacks in Paris: they were, either, as French President François Hollande says, “an act of war… committed by a terrorist army, DAESH, a jihadist army,” – or they were something else.
The accepted view, promoted by the controlled media and accepted by world leaders, is that they were, exactly as Hollande says, “an act of war” carried out by DAESH (a.k.a. ISIS, ISIL, Islamic State). Based on this interpretation, U.S. A-10 Warthogs and French fighter jets have started bombing DAESH targets in Syria.
À quoi bon?
This raises the obvious question, what’s the point? Why would any militia carry out an outrageous terror atrocity against a very powerful nation that is well prepared, willing, and ready to wage war against it as a response?
This is a situation strikingly similar to 9-11, in which the predecessor of DAESH, Al Qaida, supposedly attacked the United States, opening the door for the pre-planned invasion of Afghanistan. How convenient.
We should ask: Do these so-called Islamic groups have a desire to commit mass suicide? With the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle approaching Syria and with American A-10 Warthogs poised on the border ready for destroy anything on the ground, why would any Islamic group give such powerful forces a carte blanche reason to attack?
Is this not just a little too neat?
If you agree that this is too neat, there is the alternative view to be considered. That is that the Paris attacks are something other than what they appear to be and that the desired outcome was achieved by using a fraudulent input. That is to say that the terror attacks in Paris were, in fact, controlled and carried out by a hidden hand that used deception to produce the desired outcome. We are, after all, living in an era of massive deception.
Who might that be?
Given the fact that the fraudulent “War on Terror” is an Israeli construct dating back to the 1970s, the first suspect would have to be Israeli intelligence.
Why would they do that?
To advance the Israeli strategy known as the “War on Terror” – and destroy Syria in the process.
How would they do it?
By creating a cell of extremists who are cultivated and prepared to carry out such acts of violence.
Are there any indications that this is the case?
The fact that the Bataclan theatre was Israeli-owned until September 11, 2015, in one rather obvious clue. There are many others, such as the degree of knowledge held by the planners. For example, how did the terrorists know that the French president would be at the football game? And why did French SWAT teams wait for more than two hours to take action at the theatre?
Is Hollande part of the deception?
He could be, but I would tend to doubt it. Hollande is simply “in the pocket” of the Rothschild family and proved it by waging war in Mali on behalf of the Rothschilds and their gold interests in that poor African nation. In August 2014, Hollande appointed Emmanuel Macron, a Rothschild investment banker to head the French Ministry of Economy.
Hollande is a Rothschild puppet who does what his masters want. At this point they want him to attack Syria.
ROTHSCHILD PUPPET - François Hollande, seen here with Eric de Rothschild, serves the Rothschild family - not the Republic of France.
How does this affect the situation in Syria?
The Paris attacks bring France into the Syrian conflict, although their military actions in Syria are neither legal nor approved by the government of Syria. This increases the weight of the anti-Assad coalition vis-à-vis the Russians, who have been asked to intervene in Syria and are fighting in support of the Assad government.
Note: If you appreciate my articles please support my research and writing.
Click here to donate or via PayPal to:
Sources and Recommended Reading:
“Bashar al-Assad is Problem, Not Solution in Syria: French President Francois Hollande,” NDTV.com, October 23, 2015
"Hollande replaces critic of austerity with Rothschild banker," EurActiv.com, Reuters, August 27, 2014
"Mali - France Fights for Rothschild Gold," by Christopher Bollyn, January 19, 2013
Suspicions about the Russian Plane Crash
Updated November 13, 2015
Material added from Valentin Vasilescu's article, "Airbus 321 in the Sinaï - Only One Hypothesis Remains" - an excellent analysis by an aviation expert that supports the theory presented here.
"Once again, politicians, intelligence agents and journalists have made up their minds that a bomb triggered the crash of a Russian Airbus A321, though evidence to support this theory is ephemeral."
- Christine Negroni, "Why the rush to judgment in the Metrojet disaster?"
[Carmi] Gillon suggested that today a terror organization could take over a jet plane and “achieve something like 9-11” without fielding any flesh and blood attackers.
- Carmi Gillon, former head of Israel’s Shin Bet security service, “The double-edged sword of cyber warfare,” Times of Israel, June 24, 2015
“Cyberspace enables the attack of another nation state in offensive action, even reaching victory without leaving any fingerprints, even if it is suspected. We are already there; we are not talking about some distant future. We have experienced this in Israel’s day-to-day actions against its enemies.”
- Israel Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon, Ibid., Times of Israel, June 24, 2015
Darina Gromova, age 10 months, was on her way home from a holiday in Egypt when the Metrojet plane she was on went down in the Sinai Desert.
"MALFUNCTION IN THE WIRELESS DEVICES"
The Russian airliner was cruising at 31,000 feet when it lost contact with air traffic controllers, according to Egyptian aviation officials.
- “Officials search for cause of plane crash over Egypt's Sinai,” AP, October 31, 2015
An official in the Egyptian Air traffic control has told local reporters that the last communication with the pilot of the Russian plane was while he was flying at 30 thousand feet. The pilot complained of malfunction in the wireless devices and he asked for an emergency landing at the nearest airport.
- “Russian plane crash,” The Telegraph (UK), October 31, 2015
It remains to be seen how the U.S. and other nations supporting the mercenary forces fighting in Syria will respond to the Russian intervention. Unlike chess, this game has no rules.
- Christopher Bollyn, “Syria: The Russian Move - Changing the Game,” October 6, 2015
The October 31 crash of the Russian Metrojet passenger aircraft in the Sinai Desert, near the border of Egypt and Israel, raises some well-founded suspicions of foul play being involved in the downing of the plane. Although it is too early to say what caused the crash, there are some clear indications that suggest the plane was remotely sabotaged - via its connection to the Internet.
The Russian aircraft went down south of Al Arish, near the border of Israel, very close to Israel's main cyberwarfare and computer hacking facility, Unit 8200, located on Kibbutz Urim. Cyberwarfare is defined as "actions by a nation-state to penetrate another nation's computers or networks for the purposes of causing damage or disruption." Graphic: The Telegraph
MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT 8200 - Israel's main satellite signal intelligence facility is located on Kibbutz Urim, less than 60 miles NNE of the location where the Russian plane went down. Unit 8200, an institution of computer hackers, is the largest branch of the IDF and is responsible for the military’s offensive cyber capabilities. The Telegraph reported in 2010, "The Negev desert based Unit 8200 has evolved from the signal intelligence arm of the Israeli military into a respected leader in high technology warfare."
LEGIONS OF HACKERS - The Israeli signal intelligence facility, known as Unit 8200, has "rows of satellite dishes that covertly intercept phone calls, emails and other communications." This Israeli spy facility would have had the ability to monitor and communicate directly with the aircraft's navigation system - without the knowledge of the crew. This was the plot of the pilot episode of "The Lone Gunmen," which depicted a remotely-hijacked passenger aircraft being flown into the World Trade Center. The program aired on FOX TV in March 2001. Arnon Milchan, the Mossad Mogul of Hollywood and Rupert Murdoch's business partner, is thought to be the true author of the evil plot.
The fact that the pilot's last communication, from 30,000 feet, reported a malfunction in the airplane's wireless devices and that he asked for an emergency landing indicates that the airplane may have been in the process of being hacked externally through its satellite wireless connection. It is interesting to note that the report of the "malfunction in the wireless devices" has not been published in a single U.S. newspaper or media outlet.
Secondly, the fact that this was the pilot's last communication is significant. Even if the plane had stalled, as it seems to have done, and fallen from 30,000 feet, the pilot still would have had several minutes to communicate with air traffic controllers in Cairo - unless his communications link had been cut, which appears to be the case.
Viktor Yung, a director general of Metrojet, said, "from the moment since the events took a tragic turn, the crew became incapacitated," adding, there was not "a single attempt to get in touch (with air traffic control) and report the situation on board."
Egypt's Civil Aviation Authority reported that no Mayday signal was sent from the plane and that communication with the aircraft was normal until the aircraft disappeared from radar. This is a very telling piece of information because it indicates that the normal communication channels with the cockpit crew had been cut before the plane was remotely hijacked and sabotaged.
Last contact with the flight from flight tracking website Flightradar24 shows the aircraft climbing to 30,875 feet, after which it showed erratic altitudes and speed indications. Last altitude recorded was 27,925 feet at a speed of just 62 knots. Apparently, the plane had lost all engine power. The fact that the last altitude recorded by Flightradar24 was 27,925 feet indicates that the plane's ADS-B transponder stopped functioning - or was turned off at that point.
These reports seem to indicate that the plane may have been remotely hijacked by an unauthorized "ground pilot" who hacked into its flight system through its satellite connection to the Internet, something I discuss in "Why Did Crucial Computer Systems Fail?" in my book Solving 9-11. Remote hijacking is thought to have been the cause of the downing of Egypt Air 990 and Malaysia Airlines 370, which was apparently taken down over the Indian Ocean.
A REPEAT OF THE DOWNING OF EGYPT AIR 990?
The Russian aircraft reportedly broke up in flight. This break-up may have occurred as a result of the extreme forces the plane was subjected to as it went through radical dives and climbs in the last thirty seconds before it disappeared from radar. This scenario is very similar to the crash of Egypt Air 990, which went down exactly 16 years earlier on October 31, 1999, over the Atlantic Ocean, 62 miles south of Nantucket Island with 217 killed.
The radical changes in the plane's vertical speed (i.e. diving and climbing in feet per minute) may have caused the plane to break up at a high altitude. On November 4, Egyptian and Russian media report that an “engine explosion” is thought to be the most likely cause of the crash. If that is the case, at what point on the timeline above did the engine explode? Note: The Russian plane's transponder signals cease abruptly at 28,000 feet while the plane's ground speed is only 62 knots.
The Russian plane's radical climbs caused the aircraft to lost speed and stall, which is exactly what happened to Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501 (a Malaysian-owned Airbus A320 that fell into the Java Sea) in December 2014. (See: AirAsia Jet Climbed at Rate Beyond Design of Commercial Planes )
The tail broke off AirAsia 8501 in the same way that the tail detached from the Russian plane over the Sinai. Both planes were evidently pushed into extreme climbs, far exceeding what they were designed for, which subjected the aircraft to forces that caused them to break up.
DID THE TAIL BREAK OFF DUE TO 'EXCESSIVE DOWNLOAD'?
"The fin and aft fuselage were about 2.25 km south of the wing/fwd fuselage and south of the last radar position. so looks like that came off first for whatever reason. The photos of the fin/aft fuselage show a clean lateral break at a frame at the top indicating that is where the fracture started and the complicated rupture at the bottom being the final departure from the rest of the aircraft as the back end bent off downwards. That would indicate the failure was due to an excessive download on the horizontal stabiliser or a fatigue failure at the fuselage top adjacent the frame and then pressurisation blew the back end off."
(Source: Aero Eng Aviator, Plane Talking, November 3, 2015)
Did the downward force on the tail cause it to break off as a result of the extreme climbs the plane was pushed into? If the pilot was incommunicado, who was putting the plane through such radical moves?
The wreckage suggests that the plane disintegrated at a high altitude. “All signs indicate that the destruction of the aircraft structure occurred in air at a high altitude,” Alexander Neradko, head of the Russian Federal Air Transport Agency, said on November 1. Neradko said debris from the Airbus A321 was scattered across an “elongated ellipsis” of 3 miles in length by 2.5 miles in width.
A plane with a satellite connection to the Internet can be hijacked from the ground by an external hacker breaking into its computer system.
REMOTE HIJACKING - This connection, which is used on the Airbus 321 and other aircraft, can be exploited by an external hacker to gain access to the aircraft's navigation system.
AIRLINES RULES OUT TECHNICAL FAULT OR PILOT ERROR
Two days after the plane went down, the Russian airline that operated the aircraft said the disaster could not have been caused by a technical fault or human error. Alexander Smirnov, deputy general director of the Kogalymavia airline, said the crash could only have been the result of some other "technical or physical action" which caused it to break up in the air and plummet to the ground.
Smirnov did not specify what that action might have been, saying it was up to the official investigation to determine. The airlines had previously stated that "external factors" were behind the crash. "The plane was in excellent condition," Smirnov told a news conference in Moscow. "We rule out a technical fault and any mistake by the crew," he said.
Dalit Champion: S. Krishnasamy's backing is a boost for M. KarunanidhiWhen Chief Minister Muthuvel Karunanidhi announced i
As the seat-sharing exercise for the assembly elections draws to an end, it appears Karunanidhi was right; only, it would have been more appropriate if his partymen had described the front as the who's who of caste politics.
Never mind the fact that the DMK, or for that matter modern Dravidian politics as a whole, stands in principle for a casteless society. Electoral expediency demands otherwise. In what was an all-out effort to woo the caste parties, Karunanidhi has clearly out smarted his bete noire J. Jayalalitha.
The AIADMK supremo, however, is taking comfort in the fact that she has the support of S. Ramadoss who heads the Vanniyar-dominated Pattalli Makkal Katchi (PMK), the trend-setter as far as caste players are concerned.
Of the 13 parties which have allied with the DMK, nearly half are uninhibitedly flaunting their community base. Playing the caste card has not only given them a strange sense of legitimacy but has also enabled them to drive a good bargain for themselves.
Says a little-known A.C. Shanmugham who heads an equally little-known National Justice Party (NJP) that represents the Mudaliars: "If the DMK offers us anything less than 10 seats, I will go it alone."
The Makkal Tamil Desam (MTD), founded by former AIADMK minister S. Kannappan for the "benefit" of the Yadavas, has bagged six. J.M. Haroon, the legislator who quit the Tamil Maanila Congress (TMC) recently and floated the Tamizhaga Muslim Iykkya Jamaat, has secured three.
Even parties like the Tamil Nadu Mutharaiyar Sangam and Kongu Nadu Makkal Katchi have wrangled a seat each.
Karunanidhi's efforts to keep the new groups happy have, however, created problems within the NDA. With "just three seats" offered to it, the Vazhapadi Ramamurthy-led Tamizhaga Rajiv Congress (TRC) has walked out of the alliance.
MGR-ADMK leader S. Thirunavukkarasu is similarly cut up because he has been given only two seats by the DMK. Now with pressure mounting, Karunanidhi has promised to consider a bigger share.
Seizing an opportunity, Ramadoss, who only last month cited Ramamurthy's "irritating presence" in the NDA as the reason for his joining the AIADMK, is now reaching out to his fellow Vanniyar. And given Ramamurthy's ability to change colours, it wouldn't be surprising if he switched sides.
That will be bad news for the DMK, not because of Ramamurthy's destructive potential, but because of the advantage the AIADMK will have with the two Vanniyar leaders united. A strong indication of this came on March 24 when the Vanniyar Sangam, of which Ramamurthy is a patron, passed a resolution not to support the DMK front.
Puthiya Tamizhagam: 10 seats
Dalit Panthers of India: 8 seats
Akkal Tamil Desam: 6 seats
Tamizhaga Muslim Iykkya Jamaat: 3 seats
Tamil Nadu Mutharaiyar Sangam: 1 seat
Pongu Nadu Makkal Katchi: 1 seat
Pattali Makkal Katchi: 27 seats
IUML: Offered 1 seat by TMC, wants 3
Tamizhaga Makkal Katchi: 1 seat
Has a Muslim base.
In fact, what has quite obviously inspired leaders like Shanmugham and Kannappan to take to caste politics is the success of the PMK.
Within a decade, Ramadoss has been able to establish party units all over the state and create an impression that the northern districts are his bastions.
The PMK, which had one assembly seat in 1991, grew to a party with four legislators in 1996 when it contested without the support of either of the fronts.
In 1999, it won four Lok Sabha seats and went on to get two ministerial berths in the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Government. Today sailing with Jayalalitha, it has managed to secure for itself 27 seats to contest.
"Yes, we had to unite and launch our own party as the PMK was consolidating its position," admits Shanmugham.
"Now there will be a caste polarisation with non-Vanniyars in the northern districts supporting us." Kannappan echoes a similar claim. "The MTD's vote bank counts in as many as 184 constituencies," he says.
But why the Yadava banner? "I agree that the growth of the PMK is one reason. Also, a community which has been suppressed for more than 50 years needs to stand for itself."
While the ambitions of the NJP and the MTD may look inflated, their claims have definitely made the DMK and AIADMK sit up and think. Initially wary of their talk, Jayalalitha had dilly-dallied over a commitment on the number of seats she would part with.
Karunanidhi, on the other hand, was willing to give them a chance, and in the process make the communities they represent feel that the DMK is all-accommodating.
"Karunanidhi is the protector of all communities," endorses Kannappan. "Giving six seats to a six-month old baby is a great gesture." The chief minister knew precisely how to touch the Yadava chord. "It's like young Krishna going from mother Devaki to foster mother Yashoda," he told Kannappan. "We will foster you here."
There were other baits as well, with the DMK offering to allies its election symbol - the rising sun - to ride on. Barring the PT which has decided to have its own symbol, few have been able to resist the offer.
The entry of caste parties in its fold makes the DMK vulnerable to criticism that it is fostering casteist politics, but Karunanidhi has his cards ready. As a DMK activist points out, the presence of two major Dalit parties in his camp - the PT and the DPI - will enable the chief minister to label the AIADMK as anti-Dalit.
An argument that holds more water after the tie-up between the Thevar-supported AIADMK and the Vanniyar-backed PMK.
But AIADMK spokesperson V. Maithreyan says, "Our main partners such as the TMC, PMK, Congress and the communists are proven political parties. The DMK front, on the other hand, is a conglomeration of caste outfits."
To buttress the argument, the AIADMK is also seeking to rescue the PMK from its "caste party" image. "Having fought four elections, the PMK has outgrown its casteist moorings," adds Maithreyan. While that is a compliment Ramadoss may find selectively useful, the "baby parties" within the DMK fold have no qualms about such moorings - their only claim to fame.