Literary Criticism Essay On Hamlet Character

Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Existentialism

by Feross Aboukhadijeh, 12th grade

What is mankind? Who am I? What is the meaning of life? These are multifaceted existential questions that ancient and modern philosophies have yet to adequately answer. Countless philosophers have spent their lifetimes in search of answers to these questions but died before finding a suitable answer. Certainly, the philosophy of existentialism is an interesting phenomenon. The dictionary defines existentialism as a "philosophical movement . . . centering on analysis of individual existence in an unfathomable universe and the plight of the individual who must assume ultimate responsibility for acts of free will" ("Existentialism"). The character Hamlet from Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet explores these existential questions, seeking truth and understanding as he tries to come to grips with his father's death. In the end, Hamlet proves to be an exceedingly existential character.

Prince Hamlet is a university student who enjoys contemplating difficult philosophical questions. When his father, king of Denmark, dies, he returns home to find evidence of foul play in his father’s death. The Ghost of Hamlet (the dead king) tells Prince Hamlet that his uncle Claudius is the murderer. Throughout the rest of the play, Hamlet seeks to prove Claudius’ guilt before he takes action against Claudius. However, Hamlet is pensive ad extremum, at times even brooding; he constantly overuses his intellect while ignoring his emotions and ignoring what "feels right." His extreme logic causes him to delay his revenge against Claudius until the final scene of the play where he kills Claudius and proves that he has progressed into a truly existential character.

At the beginning of the play, Hamlet acts out of pure intellect and processed logic. He suppresses his natural instincts, his emotions, and trusts only in the power of his intelligence. For instance, when Hamlet encounters his father's ghost, he does not believe it is his father—even though he has an emotional reaction upon seeing it. Hamlet says “Let me not burst in ignorance; but tell / Why thy canoniz'd bones, hearsed in death, / Have burst their cerements . . . Say, why is this? wherefore? what should we do?” (I.iv.46-48,57). Hamlet is so confused by the sight of his father’s ghost that he is unsure of how to act. His intellect tells him that the sight is not possible, however his emotions tell him otherwise. However, he stifles his emotion and retains his doubts about the ghost. Later, Hamlet plans a play where actors re-enact the king's murder in an effort to prove the validity of what the ghost has told him.

Although Hamlet appears to be the epitome of an anti-existentialist from the outset of the story, Hamlet's logic slowly begins to unravel scene by scene, like a blood-soaked bandage, with layer after layer revealing snippets of Hamlet's emotion and feeling. When Hamlet utters the famous lines " To be, or not to be: that is the question: / Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer / The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune / Or to take arms against a sea of troubles " he is contemplating the thought of suicide and wishing that God had not made suicide a sin (III.i.58-61). Hamlet's anxiety, uncertainty, and tensions cause him to doubt the power of reason alone to solve his problems. Hamlet begins to realize that reason is impotent to deal with the depths of human life—one of the central assertions of existentialism (Bigelow, paragraph 6). Perhaps this is why Hamlet feigns madness; he realizes that he lacks the emotions to avenge his father's death. Indeed, Hamlet does go temporarily insane in Act I, scene ii, and it is during this time when he is able to act out of pure sensation, with no thoughts about the consequences of what he says or does (e.g. when he undeservingly criticizes Ophelia). However, in uniting his emotions and reason, Hamlet is careful to avoid the temptation to commit suicide because if one commits suicide to escape life's pain, then one is damned to eternal suffering in hell. To Hamlet (and most other people of the 1600s), suicide is morally wrong. By making the decision to stay alive and fight Claudius' corruption, Hamlet demonstrates existential qualities. However, this is not the only scene where Hamlet acts existentially.

In Act IV, Hamlet encounters alienation and nothingness when he meets a Norwegian captain under the command of Fortinbras. When Hamlet asks the captain about the cause and purpose of the conflict, he is shocked to learn that the countries' armies will go to war over "a little patch of land / That hath in it no profit but the name" (IV.iv.98-99). After Hamlet recovers from the shock of the captain's honesty, he is dumbstruck by the thought that Fortinbras would sacrifice the lives of thousands of men for an admittedly inferior "patch of land." At this point in the play, Hamlet is still struggling with his own inaction, unable to kill Claudius even though he knows of his guilt. Hamlet has a good reason to kill Claudius, yet he fails to do it. How can Fortinbras sacrifice so much for such a futile purpose? In this scene, Hamlet realizes the brutality of humanity and first ponders the idea that no one is safe—another central pillar of existentialism.

From this point on, Hamlet declares that he will have bloody thoughts. "My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth!" (IV.iv.9.56). Hamlet is impressed by the forcefulness of characters like Fortinbras and Laertes, who turn thought into action quickly (Phillips). Laertes, who, like Hamlet, has a father to avenge, does not hesitate for a moment when seeking vengeance on his father's murderer. As Hamlet decides to strive for this personal quality, he begins to act increasingly existential and decreasingly reflective.

When Hamlet finally does achieve his father’s vengeance, he was not spurred to it on his own, but by watching his mother and Ophelia die in front of his own eyes. Furthermore, as Hamlet realized that he had only two minutes to survive, he really had nothing to lose; this is when he made his move to stab and poison Claudius.

Prince Hamlet is introduced as a reflective, slow-to-act character. While he stays true to this characterization for almost the entire play, he does undergo a transformation by the end of the play. By the end, Hamlet decides that he is no longer going to deprive himself of the revenge he so badly desires against Claudius, so he kills him. At this point, Hamlet is existential. He is the only character who fights back against Claudius’s usurpation of the throne, and he accepts the consequences of his actions (i.e. death) without a flinch. This final existential act is what qualifies Hamlet as an existential character in an existential drama at a time when existentialism did not exist in literature.

Works Cited

Bigelow, Gordon E. “A Primer of Existentialism.” The Practical Stylist with Readings. N.p.: n.p., n.d.

“Existentialism.” Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Incorporated . 4 Mar. 2008 <http://www.merriam-webster.com/‌dictionary/‌existentialism>.

Phillips, Brian. SparkNote on Hamlet. 4 Mar. 2008 <http://www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/hamlet/>.

Aboukhadijeh, Feross. "Sample Character Analysis Essay - "Hamlet"" StudyNotes.org. Study Notes, LLC., 17 Nov. 2012. Web. 13 Mar. 2018. <https://www.apstudynotes.org/english/sample-essays/character-analysis-hamlet/>.

Online Literary Criticism Collection

Links below don’t belong?CONTACT US!

Return to: Literary Criticism Collection Home | ipl2 Home

Sites about Hamlet

by William Shakespeare

Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, needs to avenge his father's murder; this is complicated by the fact that the murderer is his own uncle, who has married Hamlet's mother (Gertrude). Hamlet eventually gets his revenge, but not before just about everyone dies.

Characters: Hamlet, Ophelia, Gertrude, Polonius, ghost of Hamlet's father
Keywords: Denmark, play within a play, Oedipus complex

Critical sites about Hamlet

Certain Speculations on Hamlet, the Calendar, and Martin Luther
http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/02-1/sohmshak.html
"This essay takes the view that Shakespeare linked the principal events in Hamletto particular holy days, and that the play's first audiences could identify these holy days from cues in the text." Special attention is paid to the possible relationship between Hamlet and the life and theology of Martin Luther.
Contains: Content Analysis, Historical Context, Character Analysis
Author: Steve Sohmer
From:Early Modern Literary Studies 2.1 (1996): 5.1-51
Keywords:
 
Hamlet and His Problems
http://www.bartleby.com/200/sw9.html
"T.S. Eliot�s essay on Shakespeare�s greatest tragic character in which he coined the famous doctrine of the 'objective correlative.'"
Contains: Character Analysis
Author: T.S. Eliot
From:The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism 1922
Keywords:
 
Hamlet Haven
http://www.hamlethaven.com/
An online, annotated bibliography, featuring character studies and different interperative approaches.
Contains: Plot Summary, Character Analysis, Historical Context, Content Analysis, Bibliography,
Author: Harmonie Blankenship
Keywords:
Access Restrictions:
 
Hamlet's Thoughts and Antics
http://eserver.org/emc/1-2/degrazia.html
Essay draft which includes a response by Juliet Fleming.
Author: Margreta de Grazia
From:Early Modern Culture. Issue 2 (2001)
Keywords:
 
Leading the Gaze: From Showing to Telling in Kenneth Branagh's Henry V and Hamlet
http://chass.utoronto.ca/emls/06-1/hatchbra.htm
"Film studies have reached the conclusion that cinema merges the acts of showing and telling. This essay applies these theories to two of Kenneth Branagh's screen adaptations Henry V (1989) and Hamlet (1996). Cinematic editing can shape space at will, create different levels of realities, and reorganize the succession of events in time. The moves and effects of the camera, by progressively revealing the people, the set or the action, add a time dimension to space. Cinematic narration defines an itinerary of the gaze, imposing a trajectory inside Shakespeare's plays, until the plots seem to prevail over discourse."
Contains: Content Analysis,
Author: Sarah Hatchuel
From:Early Modern Literary Studies 6.1 (May, 2000): 3.1-22
Keywords:
 
Making Mother Matter: Repression, Revision, and the Stakes of 'Reading Psychoanalysis Into' Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet
http://chass.utoronto.ca/emls/06-1/lehmhaml.htm
"Hamlet's peculiar bond with his mother has been the focus of numerous productions of Shakespeare's play on stage and screen. Influenced by psychoanalysis, filmed versions of Hamlet in particular have emphasized the desire between sons and mothers and, in so doing, have uncannily reproduced the play's own Oedipalized attachment to the maternal. Following Franco Zeffirelli's mother-centered film (1990), Kenneth Branagh attempts to break with this tradition in his self-proclaimed 'non-Oedipal' Hamlet (1996). Actively positioned against psychoanalysis, Branagh's Hamlet avoids any representations of non-normative sexual desire, repressing the sexualized maternal body with a vengeance and displacing Hamlet's desire onto his surrogate father, who offers 'metal more attractive' for this Hamlet and, as we shall see, for Branagh himself. In so doing, Branagh's adaptation actually becomes the most 'symptomatic' Hamlet film ever made, for it uses this performance as a screen both for projecting -- and for curing--what's the matter with Branagh, namely, his Irish motherland, and his compromised Shakespearean credentials as a postcolonial subject."
Author: Lehmann, Courtney, and Lisa S. Starks.
From:Early Modern Literary Studies 6.1 (May, 2000): 2.1-24
Keywords:
 
Multiplicity of Meaning in the Last Moments of Hamlet
http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/uni/nec/BROWN21.HTM
An analysis of Shakespeare's handling of the final moments of Hamlet's life. Also provided are links to responses to this paper that were written by other Shakespeare scholars, and published in later issues of Connotations.
Author: John Russell Brown
From:Connotations: A Journal for Critical Debate 2.1 (1992): 16-33
Keywords:
 
'Too Much in the (Black) Sun': Hamlet's First Soliloquy, A Kristevan View
http://www.hull.ac.uk/renforum/v2no2/crunelle.htm
"It may appear to be sheer provocation to attempt a psychoanalytic reading of Shakespeare, be it Kristevan or other, in a decade placed under the rule of the New Historicism."
Contains: Content Analysis
Author: Anny Crunelle-Vanrigh
From:Renaissance Forum: An Electronic Journal of Early-Modern Literary and Historical Studies Autumn 1997; vol. 2 no. 2
Keywords: psychoanalysis
 

Sorry! Our collection does not contain any other (non-critical) sites about Hamlet!

Do you know of any that you can recommend?


Couldn't find the information you were looking for?
Use these links to search for Hamlet outside the IPL.
Click a link below to automatically search that site for Hamlet:



Return to: Literary Criticism Collection Home


Last Updated Mar 25, 2014

One thought on “Literary Criticism Essay On Hamlet Character

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *